Treatment of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma

49Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of current treatment modalities for kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma. A systematic review was performed using PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and Embase for clinical studies. The outcome was measured by pooled response rate with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), together with heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias. Fifteen studies with 244 participants were included in this analysis. Vincristine therapy exhibited a relatively higher response rate (0.72; 95%CI, 0.64–0.79) compared with other therapies including systemic corticosteroid (0.27; 95%CI, 0.17–0.36), interferon (0.36; 95%CI, 0.24–0.48), radiotherapy (0.49; 95%CI, 0.26–0.73), embolization (0.66; 95%CI, 0.48–0.83), aspirin/ticlopidine (0.42; 95%CI, 0.06–0.78) and sirolimus (0.57; 95%CI, 0.00–0.10), in treating KHE/TA. Subgroup analysis indicated that the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids therapy was age-related. The pooled response rate was 0.15 (95%CI, 0.08–0.23) for participants 3.5 months of age and older compared with 0.35 (95% CI, 0.26–0.44) for participants less than 3.5 months. Regarding side effects, systemic corticosteroids treatment was 0.32 (95%CI, 0.15–0.50), vincristine modality was 0.16 (95%CI, 0.08–0.24) and interferon therapy was 0.28 (95%CI, 0.13–0.43). In conclusion, as one of the first reviews evaluating the effect of common therapies in the treatment of KHE/TA, our meta-analysis displayed that vincristine was more effective. Thus, vincristine was the most effective, providing evidence supporting the use of vincristine as a first-line therapy for KHE/TA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, X. H., Li, J. Y., Qu, X. H., Yan, W. L., Zhang, L., Yang, C., & Zheng, J. W. (2016). Treatment of kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma. International Journal of Cancer, 139(7), 1658–1666. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free