Enhanced protection against pulmonary mycobacterial challenge by chitosan-formulated polyepitope gene vaccine is associated with increased pulmonary secretory IgA and gamma-interferon+ T cell responses

41Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Induction of local (pulmonary) immunity plays a critical role in preventing dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) during the early infection stage. To induce specific mucosal immunity, chitosan, a natural cationic polysaccharide, was employed as a mucosal gene carrier and complexed with pHSP65pep, our previously constructed multi-epitope gene vaccine, which induces splenic gamma-interferon (IFN-γ)+ T helper cell 1 responses. The resultant chitosan-pHSP65pep was administered intranasally to BALB/c mice with four doses of 50μg DNA followed by mycobacterial challenge 4 weeks after the final immunization. It was found that the chitosan formulation significantly induced production of secretory immunoglobulin A (P<0.05) as determined by measuring its concentrations in lung lavage fluid and enhanced pulmonary CD4+ and CD8+IFN-γ+ T cell responses (P<0.001) compared with naked gene vaccine. Improved protection against Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) challenge was consistently achieved by the chitosan-DNA formulation both as the vaccine alone or in a BCG prime-vaccine boost immunization scenario. Our study shows that mucosal delivery of gene vaccine in a chitosan formulation remarkably enhances specific SIgA concentrations and mucosal IFN-γ+ T cell response, which correlated positively with immunological protection. © 2013 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ai, W., Yue, Y., Xiong, S., & Xu, W. (2013). Enhanced protection against pulmonary mycobacterial challenge by chitosan-formulated polyepitope gene vaccine is associated with increased pulmonary secretory IgA and gamma-interferon+ T cell responses. Microbiology and Immunology, 57(3), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free