Quality in surgical pathology communication and reporting

61Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context.-Communication in surgical pathology is complex and includes multiple facets. Objective.-Todiscussdifferent aspectsofpathologypractice that represent quality communication in surgical pathology. Data Sources.-Literature review. Conclusions.-Achieving quality communication in surgical pathology is dependent on pathologists addressing multiple situations including managing physicians' expectations for turnaround time and ancillary testing, understanding what information is needed to manage the patient at intraoperative consultation and in the final report, assuring adequate report content with the use of synoptic checklist reports, and using report formatting suggestions that aid report comprehension. Finally, the pathologists' availability to answer questions and discuss cases is an important factor in effective communication, including their willingness to verbally report urgent and significant unexpected diagnoses to ensure that important diagnoses are not overlooked. Copyright © 2011 College of American Pathologists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nakhleh, R. E. (2011). Quality in surgical pathology communication and reporting. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 135(11), 1394–1397. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2011-0192-RA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free