Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures

285Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One hundred thirty-one patients (135 fractures) who sustained an intertrochanteric fracture were assigned randomly to treatment with either a sliding hip screw or an intramedullary hip screw and followed up prospectively. In patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, the intramedullary device was associated with 23% less surgical time and 44% less blood loss; however, use of the intramedullary hip screw in patients who had a stable fracture pattern required 70% greater fluoroscopic time. Intraoperative complications occurred exclusively in patients in the intramedullary hip screw group. There were no differences in the rates of functional recovery between the two fixation groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baumgaertner, M. R., Curtin, S. L., & Lindskog, D. M. (1998). Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. In Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Vol. 348, pp. 87–94). Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199803000-00015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free