Skip to content

A Brief Taxonomy of Prototypes for the Digital Humanities

  • Ruecker S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text
This PDF is freely available from an open access repository. It may not have been peer-reviewed.

Abstract

In principle and in practice, the use of prototypes in the companion “interdisciplines” of design and the digital humanities is perhaps surprisingly similar, given the many other differences that exist between the two fields. However, in both cases there are important distinctions to be made between various categories of prototypes. In general, there are three categories of prototype, which are intended for experiment, development, and provocation respectively. Although it might be argued that the overlap between these three groups renders them useless, if they are construed correctly, it becomes clear that the distinctions are not only meaningful, but can also be suggestive of new methods of working.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruecker, S. (2015). A Brief Taxonomy of Prototypes for the Digital Humanities. Scholarly and Research Communication, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2015v6n2a222

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free