Greater fruit selection following an appearance-based compared with a health-based health promotion poster

11Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated the impact of an appearance-based compared with a traditional health-based public health message for healthy eating. Methods: A total of 166 British University students (41 males; aged 20.6 ± 1.9 years) were randomized to view either an appearance-based (n = 82) or a health-based (n = 84) fruit promotion poster. Intentions to consume fruit and immediate fruit selection (laboratory observation) were assessed immediately after poster viewing, and subsequent self-report fruit consumption was assessed 3 days later. Results: Intentions to consume fruit were not predicted by poster type (largest β = 0.03, P = 0.68) but were associated with fruit-based liking, past consumption, attitudes and social norms (smallest β = 0.16, P = 0.04). Immediate fruit selection was greater following the appearance-based compared with the health-based poster (β = -0.24, P < 0.01), and this effect remained when controlling for participant characteristics (β = -0.21, P < 0.01). Subsequent fruit consumption was greater following the appearance-based compared with the health-based poster (β = -0.22, P = 0.03), but this effect became non-significant on consideration of participant characteristics (β = -0.15, P = 0.13), and was instead associated with fruit-based liking and past consumption (smallest β = 0.24, P = 0.03). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the clear value of an appearance-based compared with a health-based health promotion poster for increasing fruit selection. A distinction between outcome measures and the value of a behavioural measure is also demonstrated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Appleton, K. M. (2016). Greater fruit selection following an appearance-based compared with a health-based health promotion poster. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 38(4), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdv147

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free