Ensino médio unitário ou multiforme?

5Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The text defends two ideas: the first one affirms that high school is the strategic educational level in the system and has a pedagogical meaning in itself. Therefore, it is considered that it is a mistake to define it as intermediate, heteronomous between the grades of elementary school and university or the job market. The second idea questions that an author such as Antonio Gramsci could be used to justify both theoretically and dialectically an early professionalizing program for high school. This assertion is based on the philological and hermeneutic analysis of Gramsci's texts. The study concludes that the implementation of quality unitary high schools in Brazil, requires deep reform of the regular high school, especially in the public sector.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nosella, P. (2015). Ensino médio unitário ou multiforme? Revista Brasileira de Educacao, 20(60), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782015206007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free