Comparing Modern Manufacturing Tools and Their Effect on Zero-Defect Manufacturing Strategies

Abstract

The aim of most manufacturing and production factories can be defined as achieving smart and sustainable long-term production systems, which means moving towards strategies defined by Zero-Defect Manufacturing strategies with many areas of improvement, such as: lowering overall cost and energy consumption, amount of scrapped output and wasting raw material and improving overall lead times, production status overview, and planning abilities. These facts were the motivations behind the writing of this paper. The authors considered if the classical architecture of Zero-Defect Manufacturing can be improved by additional tools conventionally used in modern manufacturing. The authors have selected Advanced Planning and Scheduling software tools. To prove that different scheduling methods can have a serious impact on overall production results, we prepared a simple case base comparing different scheduling rules. The theoretical basis for writing this manuscript was prepared by studying classical ZDM methodology and defining the industry gap. The methodology is based on the Zero-Defect Manufacturing architecture, which is essential for high-level implementation in industrial practice. Adding new tools, such as Scheduling and the Industrial Internet of Things, to the classic ZDM architecture improves overall methodology. The impact of different scheduling strategies, which is also described in this study, depends on industry and working conditions. The scheduling rules were compared by several key performance indicators, such as lead time and the number of late/unfinished orders. The study realized, with the practical accent shown this challenge, further research in connection with digitalization.