New graphic AUC-based method to estimate overall survival benefit: Pomalidomide reanalysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

What is known and objective Difference in median survival is an erratic measure and sometimes does not provide a good assessment of survival benefit. The aim of this study was to reanalyse the overall survival benefit of pomalidomide from pivotal clinical trial using a new area under curve (AUC)-based method. Comment In the pivotal trial, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone showed a significant survival benefit over high-dose dexamethasone, with a difference between medians of 4·6 months. The new AUC method applied to the survival curves, obtained an overall survival benefit of 2·6 months for the pomalidomide treatment. This average difference in OS was calculated for the 61·5% of patients for whom the time to event is reliable enough. What is new and conclusion This 2-month differential would have major clinical and pharmacoeconomic implications, on both cost-effectiveness studies and on the willingness of the healthcare systems to pay for this treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fenix-Caballero, S., Diaz-Navarro, J., Prieto-Callejero, B., Rios-Sanchez, E., Alegre-Del Rey, E. J., & Borrero-Rubio, J. M. (2016, February 1). New graphic AUC-based method to estimate overall survival benefit: Pomalidomide reanalysis. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12338

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free