The range of effects of azimuthal isotropy and EDA anisotropy in sedimentary basins

Abstract

Combinations of bedding‐ or lithology‐induced azimuthal isotropy, with an axis of symmetry perpendicular to the bedding plane, and crack‐induced extensive‐dilatancy anisotropy (EDA), with a horizontal axis of symmetry, are believed to be common in sedimentary basins, and cause the widely observed phenomenon of shear‐wave splitting. Combinations of two such transversely isotropic forms of anisotropy with orthogonal axes of cylindrical symmetry lead to orthorhombic symmetry. This has two major effects: (1) the polarizations of the faster split shear waves may no longer be parallel to the strike of the cracks, or fractures, even for near‐vertical propagation; and (2) such orthorhombic symmetry systems necessarily have a number of directions, called shear‐wave point singularities, where shear waves display disturbed or anomalous behaviour, again possibly in near‐vertical directions. Unless these effects are correctly identified, they could be interpreted mistakenly for the effects of structural irregularities or discontinuities. In contrast, recognition of the 3‐D geometry of this behaviour places comparatively tight constraints on possible combinations of anisotropy in the rockmass. In order to give some understanding of the geometry of these phenomena, this paper presents 3‐D patterns of the behaviour of shear‐wave splitting that have been computed for a range of combinations of crack‐ and bedding‐induced anisotropy. Copyright © 1991, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved