CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) power plants can use gigatonne-levels of CO2 sequestration to generate electricity, but it is unknown if the resources that support low-cost CPG power align with the resources that support low-cost CO2 sequestration. Here, we estimate and compare the geospatially-distributed cost of CPG and CO2 storage across a portion of North America. We find that the locations with lowest-cost CO2 storage are different than the locations with lowest-cost CPG. There are also locations with low-cost CO2 storage (
CITATION STYLE
Ogland-Hand, J. D., Adams, B. M., Bennett, J. A., & Middleton, R. S. (2022). A Geospatial Cost Comparison of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) Power and Geologic CO2 Storage. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.855120
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.