Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of coronary disease events in elderly patients submitted to coronary angiography

11Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To correlate the importance of the ankle-brachial index in terms of cardiovascular morbimortality and the extent of coronary arterial disease amongst elderly patients without clinical manifestations of lower limb peripheral arterial disease. methods: We analyzed prospective data from 100 patients over 65 years of age with coronary arterial disease, as confirmed by coronary angiography, and with over 70% stenosis of at least one sub-epicardial coronary artery. We measured the ankle-brachial index immediately after coronary angiography, and a value of <0.9 was used to diagnose peripheral arterial disease. results: The patients' average age was 77.4 years. The most prevalent risk factor was hypertension (96%), and the median late follow-up appointment was 28.9 months. The ankle-brachial index was <0.9 in 47% of the patients, and a low index was more prevalent in patients with multiarterial coronary disease compared to patients with uniarterial disease in the same group. Using a bivariate analysis, only an ankle-brachial index of <0.9 was a strong predictive factor for cardiovascular events, thereby increasing all-cause deaths and fatal and non-fatal acute myocardial infarctions two-to three-fold. conclusion: In elderly patients with documented coronary disease, a low ankle-brachial index (<0.9) was associated with the severity and extent of coronary arterial disease, and in late follow-up appointments, a low index was correlated with an increase in the occurrence of major cardiovascular events. © 2013 clinics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papa, E. D. E., Helber, I., Ehrlichmann, M. R., Rodrigues Alves, C. M., Makdisse, M., Matos, L. N., … Carvalho, A. C. (2013). Ankle-brachial index as a predictor of coronary disease events in elderly patients submitted to coronary angiography. Clinics, 68(12), 1481–1487. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(12)02

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free