The school as ecosystem of developing child-adult communities: Activity approach to designing the school of the future

18Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper analyses the main paths of designing an effective model of the 'School of the Future' through the lens of cultural-historical theory and activity approach. Contrary to the existing models (such as the 'Chinese School of the Future', 'European School of the Future' etc), the design strategy in cultural-historical approach is aimed at creating a communication-and activity-based environment of sign which is based on the variety of child-adult communities and activity types. Thus in such an environment the process of growing up is shaped by the children's inclusion into various communities and by the rich opportunities for self-determination through the acquisition of different social practices which, in turn, promote the development of individual cognitive strategies. According to the principles of cultural-historical psychology, the source of human development in the school of the future is closely related to the acquisition of patterns of action and sign means that mediate the individual's status in different communities mastering different activities. Acquiring such socially adopted patterns of action enables the children to participate in the activities of various social communities that have their own practices, to understand the general principles of their functioning, to coordinate different activity types while preserving their self in many social communities simultaneously, and, eventually, to influence the development of these very communities; and, the last but not the least, to establish new social communities, if necessary, and design their new activities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gromyko, Y. V., Margolis, A. A., & Rubtsov, V. V. (2020). The school as ecosystem of developing child-adult communities: Activity approach to designing the school of the future. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free