Application of the international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes

31Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In march 1997 an international workshop introduced a new International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for MDS. The goal of the present study was to apply the IPSS to a large group of MDS patients from one centre and to compare it to the FAB-classification. Patients: One hundred eighty-four MDS patients were included on the basis of similar criteria as used by the workshop but some of them (30) received AML-type therapy. Results: The IPSS separated our patients into distinctive prognostic subgroups (P = 0.0001). Median survival was respectively 6.5, 2.6, 1.3 and 0.75 years for the low-risk (22% of patients), the intermediate-1-risk (INT- 1) (46%), the intermediate-2-risk (INT-2) (25%) and the high-risk group (7%). The IPSS also discriminated within each of the FAB-categories: RA patients (58 patients) were present in low-risk, INT-1-risk and INT-2-risk subgroups, RARS patients (23) were separated into low-risk and INT-1-risk subgroups. RAEB patients (53) were distributed predominantly between INT-1-risk and INT- 2-risk groups, RAEB-t patients (23) between INT-2-risk and high-risk subgroups, CMML patients (27) were present in the low-risk, the INT-l-risk and the INT-2-risk group. Conclusions: Our results confirm the effectiveness of the IPSS in predicting clinical outcome in MDS patients and indicate that it is an improved method compared to the FAB-classification.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maes, B., Meeus, P., Michaux, L., Bijnens, L., Boogaerts, M., Hagemeijer, A., … Verhoef, G. (1999). Application of the international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Annals of Oncology, 10(7), 825–829. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008335814674

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free