Comparative analysis of the efficacy and biocompatibility of various methods of dialysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The efficacy and biocompatibility of hemodialysis have a singnificant impact on dialysis patient morbidity and mortality rate. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and biocompatibility of different hemodialysis modalities in our patients. METHODS: A total of 55 patients were included in the study, and on the basis of dialysis modality, they were divided in four groups: group I--post-dilution on-line hemodiafiltration (n=15), group II--bicarbonate high-flux polysulphone hemodialysis (n=15), group III--bicarbonate low-flux polysulphone hemodialysis (n=15), and groupe IV--bicarbonate cuprophane hemodialysis (n=10). The efficacy was evaluated on the basis of urea reduction rate (URR), urea Kt/V index and serum beta2-microglobuline reduction rate, and the biocompatibility was evaluated on the basis of the leukocyte count fall during the first fiftheen minutes of dialysis session, and of the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level. RESULTS: The highest mean URR was achieved in the group I (70.53 +/- 6.49%), and it was significantly higher in comparison with the average URR in the group IV (54.8 +/- 6.35%) (p = 0.001). The average value of urea Kt/V index in the group I (1.48 +/- 0.22) was significantly higher in comparison with the average value in the group II 1.30 +/- 0.22 (p < 0.05), group III (1.05 +/- 0.22), and group IV (0.98 + 0.22) (p = 0.001). Serum beta2-microglobuline reduction rate was 68.93 +/- 8.25% in the group I, and 58.86 +/- 7.98% in the groupe II (p = 0.01). During the first 15 minutes of hemodialysis the leukocyte number was decreased by 12.57 +/- 9.35% in the group 1, 13.61 +/- 9.64% in the group 11, 18.3 +/- 13.24 in the group III and 62.3 +/- 15.4 in the group IV, on average. The mean serum level of CRP was 9.4 +/- 6.47 mg/l in the group IV, and less than 3.5 mg/l in the group I of the patients (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Postdilution on-line hemodiafiltration in comparison with standard hemodialysis provided the more effective elimination of small and middle uremic toxins molecules and a significantly higher degree of biocompatibility. The patients treated with standard hemodialysis frequently do not achieve the minimal value of urea Kt/V index prescribed by National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Inatiatives standards. These patients also have significantly higher serum CRP values which suggest the state of chronic microinflammation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zivanović, M., Hrvacević, R., Kovacević, Z., Veljancić, L., & Vujanić, S. (2005). Comparative analysis of the efficacy and biocompatibility of various methods of dialysis. Vojnosanitetski Pregled. Military-Medical and Pharmaceutical Review, 62(10), 725–729. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP0510725Z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free