Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III REACH2 Trial

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Approximately 30%-50% of patients develop acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT), representing a major limitation of this treatment. Although corticosteroids remain the standard first-line therapy for aGVHD, up to 50% of patients become steroid-refractory (SR). REACH2 is a phase III study of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients age 12 years and older with SR-aGVHD after Allo-HCT. We present the final efficacy and safety outcomes from REACH2 after 24 months of treatment. Cumulative median (range) duration of response was 167 (22-677) days with ruxolitinib and 106 (10-526) days with BAT. Median overall survival and event-free survival were 10.7 and 8.3 months for ruxolitinib, compared with 5.8 and 4.2 months, respectively, with BAT. Median failure-free survival was significantly longer with ruxolitinib than with BAT (4.86 v 1.02 months, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohty, M., Socié, G., Szer, J., Niederwieser, D., Butler, J., Wagner-Drouet, E., … von Bubnoff, N. (2025). Ruxolitinib Versus Best Available Therapy in Patients With Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase III REACH2 Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43(34), 3639–3645. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-25-00809

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free