Validation of MEDFICTS Dietary Assessment Questionnaire in Turkish Population

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of MEDFICTS (Meats, Eggs, Dairy, Fried foods, fat In baked goods, Convenience foods, fats added at the Table, Snacks) questionnaire in Turkish population. Design: MEDFICTS questionnaire is a brief dietary assessment tool developed as part of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel guidelines, and it measures the adherence to Step 1 and Step 2 diets that are recommended for the prevention and treatment of CVD. MEDFICTS questionnaire was administered with 3-d food record to compare overall dietary fat intake. Setting: This study was conducted at the Hacettepe University (Ankara, Turkey) in 2017. Participants: Subjects were university students, recruited from several departments of Hacettepe University by trained dietitians. A total of 442 adults (249 females and 194 males) between the ages of 18 and 31 years participated in the study. Students with CVD were excluded. Results: Total fat intake ratio was higher than the recommended level for both males and females (39·4 % and 39·9 %, respectively). Mean MEDCISTS score was 66·3 ± 27·24 points. Total energy, total fat, SFA and cholesterol intakes from 3-d food records within the different MEDFICTS diet groups significantly differed (P < 0·001 for all). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis demonstrated that a cut-off point of 60 showed 80 % sensitivity and 65 % specificity. Conclusions: Our data indicate that the MEDFICTS questionnaire is moderately accurate; however, sensitivity analysis did not demonstrate the recommended 40 points as an optimal cut-off point for Turkish population.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Göktaş, Z., DIkmen, D., & Raklcloǧlu, N. (2022). Validation of MEDFICTS Dietary Assessment Questionnaire in Turkish Population. Public Health Nutrition, 25(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021002299

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free