Reconciling inconsistencies in precipitation–productivity relationships: implications for climate change

333Citations
Citations of this article
301Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

(Table presented.). Summary: Precipitation (PPT) is a primary climatic determinant of plant growth and aboveground net primary production (ANPP) over much of the globe. Thus, PPT–ANPP relationships are important both ecologically and to land–atmosphere models that couple terrestrial vegetation to the global carbon cycle. Empirical PPT–ANPP relationships derived from long-term site-based data are almost always portrayed as linear, but recent evidence has accumulated that is inconsistent with an underlying linear relationship. We review, and then reconcile, these inconsistencies with a nonlinear model that incorporates observed asymmetries in PPT–ANPP relationships. Although data are currently lacking for parameterization, this new model highlights research needs that, when met, will improve our understanding of carbon cycle dynamics, as well as forecasts of ecosystem responses to climate change.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knapp, A. K., Ciais, P., & Smith, M. D. (2017). Reconciling inconsistencies in precipitation–productivity relationships: implications for climate change. New Phytologist, 214(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free