Single-center, observational study of AML/MDS-EB with IDH1/2 mutations: genetic profile, immunophenotypes, mutational kinetics and outcomes

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: IDH1/2 mutations, intervening in epigenetic procedures, are frequently encountered in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Knowledge of the genetics, immunophenotypes, and mutational kinetics of IDH1/2-mutated AML can contribute to the understanding of AML clonal architecture and inform therapeutics and monitoring. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 50 IDH1/2-mutated AML/MDS-EB cases of our institution, to identify recurrent co-mutations, immunophenotypes, patterns of co-variance of IDH1/2 allele burdens with those of recurrent co-mutations, frequency of persistent IDH1/2 mutation as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) in remission and response to hypomethylating agents. Results: Most frequently co-mutated genes were DNMT3A, SRSF2 and NPM1. Most cases with co-existent IDH1/2 and NPM1 mutations (11/13) showed an ‘APL-like’ immunophenotype (CD34-HLADR-). Allele burdens of mutated IDH1/2 were identical to mutated SRSF2 allele burdens at diagnosis and remission, but not always to mutated NPM1 allele burden in remission. We show persistence of significant mutIDH1/2 allele burden in approximately one-fourth of patients with deep remissions. IDH1/2 mutations were significantly more frequent among responders to first-line HMA-based regimens than among non-responders, in patients treated for myeloid neoplasms with excess blasts. Conclusions: IDH1/2 mutations are most frequently accompanied by DNMT3A, SRSF2 and NPM1 mutations. NPM1-IDH1/2 mutated AML has a mature phenotype possibly amenable to differentiation therapies. IDH1/2 and SRSF2 mutations probably arise at the same developmental stage of the disease, as their allele burdens covariate. IDH1/2 mutation represents CHIP in a substantial proportion of cases and is therefore no reliable residual disease marker. The preferential presence of IDH1/2 mutations among HMA-responders could inform therapeutic decisions if confirmed in larger series.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papadopoulou, V., Schoumans, J., Basset, V., Solly, F., Pasquier, J., Blum, S., & Spertini, O. (2023). Single-center, observational study of AML/MDS-EB with IDH1/2 mutations: genetic profile, immunophenotypes, mutational kinetics and outcomes. Hematology (United Kingdom), 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2023.2180704

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free