Does Bilateral ITA Grafting Increase Perioperative Complications? Outcome of 6,476 Patients with Bilateral versus 5,020 Patients with Single ITA Bypass

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives Despite the superior patency of internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting compared with saphenous veins, frequency of bilateral ITA (BITA) grafting in Europe is still approximately 10%. The aim of the present study was to compare the early outcome of patients receiving either BITA or single ITA (SITA) grafting. Methods A total of 11,496 patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), operated between January 1996 and December 2012, were analyzed retrospectively; 0.6476 patients (mean age 65.2 years, 81.3% males) received BITA and 5,020 patients (mean age 66.6 years, 76.7% males) SITA grafting. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.2 versus 27.4, p = 0.017. Incidence of diabetes was 28.9 versus 28.4%, p = 0.08. Ejection fraction (EF) > 50 was 71.3% (BITA) versus 66.3% (SITA), p < 0.001. Elective operations were performed in 88.4% (BITA) versus 83.3% (SITA), and urgent/emergent surgery was necessary in 11.6% (BITA) versus 16.7% (SITA), p < 0.001. Results Number of grafts was 3.76 (BITA) versus 3.06, p < 0.001. Duration of surgery (194.4 vs. 180.4 minutes) as well as X-clamp time (60.4 vs. 51.7 minutes) was prolonged for BITA, p < 0.001. Perioperative infarction rate revealed 3.2% (BITA) versus 3.6%, p = 0.54. Frequency of rethoracotomy due to bleeding was higher in the BITA group (3.8 vs. 2.1%), p < 0.001. Sternal instabilities occurred in 2.3% (BITA) versus 2.2%, p = 0.749. Duration of mechanical ventilation < 12 hours was 74.6 versus 77.1%, p = 0.09 and duration of in-hospital stay was 10.5 versus 10.4 days, p = 0.68. Thirty-day mortality was 2.4% (BITA) versus 3.0%, p = 0.09. Multivariate analysis identified prolonged duration of surgery, BMI > 30, emergent operations, advanced age, and BITA grafting as predictor for sternal instabilities. EF < 30%, advanced age plus emergency were associated with increased 30-day mortality. Conclusion CABG using BITA can be performed routinely with good clinical results and low mortality. Compared with SITA grafting, bleeding complications were enhanced.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deutsch, O., Gansera, L., Wunderlich, M., Eichinger, W., & Gansera, B. (2016). Does Bilateral ITA Grafting Increase Perioperative Complications? Outcome of 6,476 Patients with Bilateral versus 5,020 Patients with Single ITA Bypass. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 64(3), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1558992

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free