Cavernous carotid aneurysms: To treat or not to treat?

70Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most cavernous carotid aneurysms (CCAs) are considered benign lesions, most often asymptomatic, and to have a natural history with a low risk of life-threatening complications. However, several conditions may exist in which treatment of these aneurysms should be considered. Several options are currently available regarding the management of CCAs with resultant good outcomes, namely expectant management, luminal preservation strategies with or without addressing the aneurysm directly, and Hunterian strategies with or without revascularization procedures. In this article, we discuss the sometimes difficult decision regarding whether to treat CCAs. We consider the natural history of several types of CCAs, the clinical presentation, the current modalities of CCA management and their outcomes to aid in the management of this heterogeneous group of cerebral aneurysms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eddleman, C. S., Hurley, M. C., Bendok, B. R., & Batjer, H. H. (2009). Cavernous carotid aneurysms: To treat or not to treat? Neurosurgical Focus. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.FOCUS0920

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free