The anti-gender threat: An ethical, democratic, and scientific imperative for NIH research/ers

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Anti-gender campaigns in the United States and globally have promoted policies and legislation that significantly limit bodily autonomy for women, transgender, and nonbinary people. This attack on the human rights of women and gender-diverse communities not only reflects implicit and explicit bias but also detrimentally impacts population health and well-being. We outline the domestic and global rise of anti-gender campaigns and their deep historical connections to broader forms of discrimination and inequality to argue that there is an ethical, democratic, and scientific imperative to more critically center and contextualize gender in health research. While the inclusion of gender as a complex concept in research design, implementation, and dissemination is important, we emphasize that gender inequities must be understood as inextricable from other systems of discrimination and exclusion. To that end, this commentary outlines two actions: for researchers to advance critical approaches to gender as part of a broader landscape of discrimination, and for the US National Institutes of Health to integrate both sex and gender into funded research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perez-Brumer, A., Valdez, N., & Scheim, A. I. (2024). The anti-gender threat: An ethical, democratic, and scientific imperative for NIH research/ers. Social Science and Medicine, 351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free