Influence of wash aids on Bacillus spore removal from an asphalt parking lot using two spray-based washing methods

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: The goal of this study was to measure the removal efficacy of Bacillus atrophaeus spores from a parking lot using spray-based washing methods (a pressure washer and a garden hose) and wash aids. B. atrophaeus is a commonly used nonpathogenic surrogate for B. anthracis, the causative agent of anthrax and a deadly bioterrorism agent that would cause major disruptions and damage to public health should it be disseminated over an urban area. Methods and Results: Five wash aids (1 mM sodium chloride, an Instant Ocean® seawater solution, 0.01% Tween 20, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and unamended tap water) were used along with two different spray sequences in this study. Across all treatment conditions, 3.7–6.4 log10 colony forming unit were recovered in the runoff water, and 0.15%–23% of spores were removed from the surface of the parking lot. Conclusions: Pressure washing removed more spores than the garden hose, and for both types of washing methods, the first pass removed more spores than the subsequent passes. The Instant Ocean and Tween 20 wash aids were found to significantly increase the percentage of spore removal when using the pressure washer, but the overall increase was only 1%–2% compared to the tap water alone. Significance and Impact of Study: This study provides public officials and emergency responders with baseline spore physical removal information for situations where a corrosive disinfectant might have a negative impact on the environment and washing is being considered as an alternative remediation approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mikelonis, A. M., Fuller, C., Ratliff, K., Touati, A., & Calfee, M. W. (2022). Influence of wash aids on Bacillus spore removal from an asphalt parking lot using two spray-based washing methods. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 132(4), 2773–2780. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15405

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free