On the generalised eigenvalue method and its relation to Prony and generalised pencil of function methods

27Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We discuss the relation of a variety of different methods to determine energy levels in lattice QCD simulations: the generalised eigenvalue, the Prony, the generalised pencil of function and the Gardner methods. All three former methods can be understood as special cases of a generalised eigenvalue problem. We show analytically that the leading corrections to an energy El in all three methods due to unresolved states decay asymptotically exponentially like exp (- (En- El) t). Using synthetic data we show that these corrections behave as expected also in practice. We propose a novel combination of the generalised eigenvalue and the Prony method, denoted as GEVM/PGEVM, which helps to increase the energy gap En- El. We illustrate its usage and performance using lattice QCD examples. The Gardner method on the other hand is found less applicable to realistic noisy data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fischer, M., Kostrzewa, B., Ostmeyer, J., Ottnad, K., Ueding, M., & Urbach, C. (2020). On the generalised eigenvalue method and its relation to Prony and generalised pencil of function methods. European Physical Journal A, 56(8). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00205-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free