An analysis of the essential understandings in elementary geometry and a comparison to the common core standards with teaching implications

13Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Geometry and spatial reasoning form the foundations of learning in mathematics. However, geometry is a subject often ignored by curriculum writers and teachers until high school, leading to students lacking in critical skills in geometric reasoning. As the United States moves into a new curriculum epoch, heralding the commencement of the national common core standards (CCS), one could question if CCS in geometry align with the essential understandings children need to be successful geometric thinkers. This paper begins with an examination of the essential understandings of geometric reasoning leading to an interpretation and critique of the elementary geometry CCS. Finally, the instructional implications are discussed, considering the common core progression through what we know about how children learn geometry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crompton, H., & Ferguson, S. (2024, April 1). An analysis of the essential understandings in elementary geometry and a comparison to the common core standards with teaching implications. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Bastas. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/14361

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free