Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

5Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) is as effective as ranibizumab (Lucentis®) in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). However it has two important structural differences. First, it has two active sites instead of one second, it retains the Fc portion of the antibody which would be expected to confer a significantly longer half-life. These agents have been associated with systemic complications including strokes, so it is desirable to use the smallest effective dose. Furthermore, the standard dosing regimen requires monthly hospital visits, which present a significant challenge both to the hospital services and to the patients (who are elderly). Methods/Design: Patients ≥50years who are eligible for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of nAMD in the NHS, who are either newly referred for treatment or have reactivation of nAMD and who have not received treatment to either eye for the previous six months. Discussion: This randomised control trial will show if half dose and two monthly as required is as effective as full dose and monthly regimes. A two monthly as required regimen of Bevacizumab would significantly reduce both the cost and the service delivery burden for the treatment of nAMD while a reduced dose would be expected to enhance the safety profile of this treatment regime. Trial registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN95654194, registered on 22 September 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foss, A. J. E., Childs, M., Reeves, B. C., Empeslidis, T., Tesha, P., Dhar-Munshi, S., … Montgomery, A. (2015). Comparing different dosing regimens of bevacizumab in the treatment of neovascular macular degeneration: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0608-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free