Comparative Analysis of Legal Protection and Criteria of Well-Known Marks (Indonesia, United States, India, China, and Germany)

  • Winatha I
  • Prathama A
  • Kayuan P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Trademark functions as a distinguishing mark between goods and/or services of its kind, as well as an identification mark for goods and/or services from the producer concerned. In order to be a well-known and widely recognized mark by the world community, and also to gain a good reputation it requires a very high investment to maintain quality and perform massive promotions in many countries. Considering this, lawful protection of well-known marks is a must. This research uses a normative juridical method by examining regulations and analyzing the previous studies, as well as other relevant legal materials to determine the criteria of well-known marks and the law protection provided for well-known marks in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of the criteria for well-known marks in Indonesia still does not set concretely the minimum number that must be met for each criterion. Furthermore, in principle, Indonesia provides legal protection for well-known marks, both registered and unregistered in Indonesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Winatha, I. G. M. Y., Prathama, A. A. G. A. I., & Kayuan, P. C. K. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Legal Protection and Criteria of Well-Known Marks (Indonesia, United States, India, China, and Germany). Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.23768

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free