A Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Recent Root-End Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study

  • Saraswathi D
  • Tejavath S
  • Babu M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims and Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Plus, Biodentine, and MTA. Materials and Methods: One forty maxillary incisors were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. All samples were randomly divided into 2 control and 3 experimental groups of 28 samples each. In the Group I, no apical preparation was done. The apical 3 mm of the samples in the other groups were resected, and 3 mm deep cavity was prepared and filled with gutta-percha, Biodentine, MTA Plus, and MTA, respectively. In negative control group, the entire specimen was coated with three layers of nail varnish; all samples in Groups II-V were coated with three layers of nail varnish except at the apical resected root surface. All samples were immersed in 2% rhodamine B dye for 72 h. The teeth were then sectioned longitudinally and examined under stereomicroscope. Results: MTA Plus showed less microleakage compared to Biodentine and MTA. Conclusion: MTA Plus showed a better seal than that of Biodentine and MTA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saraswathi, D. D., Tejavath, S. K., Babu, M. R., Swetha, B., & Gandhi, B. (2015). A Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Recent Root-End Filling Materials: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Advanced Oral Research, 6(2), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2229411220150206

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free