Dietary patterns and the risk of metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults: A population-based cross-sectional study

30Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective Data on dietary patterns in relation to the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in a middle-aged Chinese population are sparse. The present study was performed to determine the major dietary patterns among a population aged 45-59 years and to evaluate their associations with MetS risk in China.Design Cross-sectional examination of the association between dietary patterns and MetS. Face-to-face interviews were used to assess dietary intake using a validated semi-quantitative FFQ. OR and 95 % CI for MetS were calculated across quartiles of dietary pattern scores using multivariate logistic regression analysis models.Setting City of Linyi, Shandong Province, China.Subjects Adults (n 1918) aged 45-59 years.Results Three major dietary patterns were identified: traditional Chinese, animal food and high-energy. After adjustment for potential confounders, individuals in the highest quartile of the traditional Chinese pattern had a reduced risk of MetS relative to the lowest quartile (OR=0·72, 95 % CI 0·596, 0·952; P<0·05). Compared with those in the lowest quartile, individuals in the highest quartile of the animal food pattern had a greater risk of MetS (OR=1·28; 95 % CI 1·103, 1·697; P<0·05). No significant association was observed between the high-energy pattern and risk of MetS.Conclusions These findings indicate that the traditional Chinese pattern was associated with a reduced risk, while the animal food pattern was associated with increased risk of MetS. Given the cross-sectional nature of our study, further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wei, Z. Y., Liu, J. J., Zhan, X. M., Feng, H. M., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2018). Dietary patterns and the risk of metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults: A population-based cross-sectional study. Public Health Nutrition, 21(13), 2409–2416. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018001088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free