Monitoring neuromuscular block by acceleromyography: Comparison of the mini-accelograph with the myograph 2000

55Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The precision of the compact Mini-Accelograph (M-A) was compared with the Myograph 2000 (MYO). Neuromuscular block resulting from atracurium was measured simultaneously by the MYO and the M-A applied to contralateral thumbs. During onset, the M-A frequently underestimated the extent of block (maximal at approximately 50% twitch depression). The M-A control train-of-four (TOF) ratio was characteristically > 1.0 and remained greater than the MYO ratio during the onset of atracurium. During recovery, the difference between the MYO and the M-A was maximal at approximately 50% twitch depression, but the M-A frequently overestimated the extent of block. The mean differences between the MYO and the M-A were small in respect of the recovery index (RI) and the TOF. However, the limits of agreement were unacceptably wide for both TOF and RI. When the MYO TOF was 0.7, the corresponding M-A TOF varied between 0.4 and 1.0. The M-A was more susceptible to drift than the MYO. (Br. J. Anaesth. 1994; 72: 411-414) © 1994 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harper, N. J. N., Martlew, R., Strang, T., & Wallace, M. (1994). Monitoring neuromuscular block by acceleromyography: Comparison of the mini-accelograph with the myograph 2000. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 72(4), 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/72.4.411

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free