Opinion on Performing Pathology Peer-Review During the Global Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities

6Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has affected business on numerous fronts in unprecedented and abrupt ways. From site closures and local “stay-at-home orders” to travel advisories and restrictions, the day-to-day practice of toxicologic pathology has been impacted dramatically and rapidly. A critical function of Toxicologic Pathologists is performing pathology peer review for nonclinical studies. Traditionally, corroborating the findings of histological assessment could be achieved through shipment of histopathological slides to the peer review pathologist, or by the peer review pathologist traveling to the location of the slides (eg, the test facility). Since early 2020, many pathologists have been unable to perform the latter due to local, regional, national, test facility, company, and/or personal restrictions. The disruption for some has been minimal, while others are working from home for the first time. We recommend that contingency plans for all peer review procedures and personnel should be in-place to accommodate sudden and unexpected workflow transitions. Now, more than ever, approaching peer reviews with enhanced adaptability will help ensure success.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hukkanen, R. R., Irizarry, A., Fikes, J. D., Schafer, K. A., & Boyle, M. H. (2020). Opinion on Performing Pathology Peer-Review During the Global Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities. Toxicologic Pathology, 48(8), 944–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623320964087

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free