Comparison of frailty, sarcopenia and protein energy wasting in a contemporary peritoneal dialysis cohort

24Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: More elderly frail patients are now treated by peritoneal dialysis (PD). Frailty, sarcopenia and protein energy wasting (PEW) are all associated with increased mortality. Simple screening tools are required to identify patients to allow for interventions. As such, we wished to review the prevalence of frailty and compare frailty with sarcopenia and PEW in a contemporary PD population. Patients and methods: We used the Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) to determine frailty, bio-impedance body composition and hand grip strength (HGS) to determine sarcopenia and combining laboratory, body composition and protein nitrogen appearance rate (PNA) to assess PEW. Results: Records of 368 PD patients, 61% male, mean age 60.9 ± 16.1 years, body mass index (BMI) 26.2 ± 5.1 kg/m2 were reviewed, with 71 classified as frail (19.3%; CFS > 4), and frailty associated with age (odds ratio (OR) 1.047, 95% confidence interval (CL) 1.01–1.085, p = 0.012), Stoke-Davies co-morbidity (OR 1.808, 95%CL 1.129–2.895, p = 0.014) and negatively with HGS (OR 0.906, 95% CL 0.897–0.992, p = 0.033); 17.7% met muscle loss and HGS criteria for sarcopenia, with fair agreement with frailty (kappa 0.24 (CL 0.09–0.38)). Only two patients (0.5%) met all four criteria for PEW, 26.1% met the reduced BMI criteria, 4.6% the serum albumin, 32.9% the PNA and 39.4% the reduced muscle mass. HGS correlated with lean muscle mass (r2 = 0.42, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Using the CFS, 19.3% of patients were classified as frail, compared to 17.7% with sarcopenia and <1% with PEW. The CFS requires no special equipment or laboratory tests and was associated with age, co-morbidity and HGS weakness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davenport, A. (2022). Comparison of frailty, sarcopenia and protein energy wasting in a contemporary peritoneal dialysis cohort. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 42(6), 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608221077462

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free