How to grow a healthy merger tree

50Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigate seven Monte Carlo algorithms - four old and three new - for constructing merger histories of dark matter haloes, using the extended Press-Schechter (EPS) formalism based on both the spherical and ellipsoidal collapse models. We compare, side-by-side, the algorithms' abilities at reproducing the analytic EPS conditional (or progenitor) mass function over a broad range of mass and redshift (z = 0 to 15). Among the four old algorithms (those by Lacey & Cole, Kauffmann & White, Somerville & Kolatt and Cole et al.), we find that only the method of Kauffmann & White produces a progenitor mass function that is consistent with the EPS prediction for all look-back redshifts. The origins of the discrepancies in the other three algorithms are discussed. Our three new algorithms are designed to generate the correct progenitor mass function at each time-step. We show that this is a necessary and sufficient condition for consistency with EPS at any look-back time. We illustrate the differences between the three new algorithms and the method of Kauffmann & White one by investigating two other conditional statistics: the mass function of the i th most massive progenitors and the mass function for descendants with Np progenitors. © 2008 RAS.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, J., Fakhouri, O., & Ma, C. P. (2008). How to grow a healthy merger tree. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(4), 1521–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13671.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free