Failure to Launch: Competing Institutional Logics, Intrapreneurship, and the Case of Chatbots

26Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article explores the institutional logics of intrapreneurial units, or groups within organizations that are designated to foster organizational innovation. Drawing on interviews with news intrapreneurs developing chatbots in news media organizations, this study shows that innovation can be stymied because of conflicting institutional logics. News intrapreneurs adopt a logic of experimentation, audience orientation, and efficiency-seeking, but that approach clashes with a journalistic logic prioritizing news workflows, formats, and associated autonomy for newsworkers. These clashing logics limit the adoption and influence of chatbots. This study illustrates the shaping influence of competing institutional logics and their negotiation in the development, deployment, and success or failure of intrapreneurial activities within organizations. The lesson is not that the existence of competing logics is, by default, a defeating proposition for innovation. Rather, this study advances scholarly understanding of the role of institutional logics in frustrating or facilitating technological adoption in organizations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belair-Gagnon, V., Lewis, S. C., & Agur, C. (2020). Failure to Launch: Competing Institutional Logics, Intrapreneurship, and the Case of Chatbots. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(4), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free