Analysis and Comparison of Tissue-Marking Dye Detection via Light Microscopy, Telemicroscopy, and Virtual Microscopy

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To examine the fidelity of ink color identification using light microscopy (LM), telemicroscopy (TM), and virtual microscopy (VM). Methods: Twenty H and E-stained frozen section slides, prepared after tissue inking with five stain combinations, were assessed by three pathologists using LM, TM, and VM. TM was performed using Mikroscan D2 slide scanner/LiveQ software with various objectives. VM was performed using Mikroscan D2 scanner/Qumulus software, specimens digitized at 20. Results: Sensitivity/specificity by LM was 100%/100% for all colors. TM showed high overall specificity but poor sensitivity, particularly red (54%). VM showed high specificity for all colors except black (69%) and, consequently, poor sensitivity for all colors except black (96%).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hon, J. D., Chen, W., Minerowicz, C., Thomas, S., Barnard, N., Gilbert, N., & Fyfe, B. (2019). Analysis and Comparison of Tissue-Marking Dye Detection via Light Microscopy, Telemicroscopy, and Virtual Microscopy. In American Journal of Clinical Pathology (Vol. 151, pp. 95–99). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqy117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free