The substitution processes for various models of deleterious alleles are examined using computer simulations and mathematical analyses. Most of the work focuses on the house-of-cards model, which is a popular model of deleterious allele evolution. The rate of substitution is shown to be a concave function of the strength of selection as measured by α = 2Nσ, where N is the population size and σ is the standard deviation of fitness. For α < 1, the house-of-cards model is essentially a neutral model; for α > 4, the model ceases to evolve. The stagnation for large α may be understood by appealing to the theory of records. The house-of-cards model evolves to a state where the vast majority of all mutations are deleterious, but precisely one-half of those mutations that fix are deleterious (the other half are advantageous). Thus, the model is not a model of exclusively deleterious evolution as is frequently claimed. It is argued that there are no biologically reasonable models of molecular evolution where the vast majority of all substitutions are deleterious. Other models examined include the exponential and gamma shift models, the Hartl-Dykhuizen-Dean (HDD) model, and the optimum model. Of all those examined, only the optimum and HDD models appear to be reasonable candidates for silent evolution. None of the models are viewed as good candidates for protein evolution, as none are both biologically reasonable and exhibit the variability in substitutions commonly observed in protein sequence data.
CITATION STYLE
Gillespie, J. H. (1994). Substitution processes in molecular evolution. III. Deleterious alleles. Genetics, 138(3), 943–952. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/138.3.943
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.