Whose democracy? Histories of British political culture between the wars

38Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article reviews the current state of historical writing on British political culture in the interwar period, with a particular focus on the character of the democratic society which emerged from the franchise extensions of 1918 and 1928. It takes as its starting point the influential interpretation advanced by Ross McKibbin in his two most recent books, Classes and cultures (1998) and Parties and people (2010). This holds that Britain's interwar democracy came to be shaped in the image of the anti-socialist middle class, buoyed by the centrist appeal of Baldwinite constitutional Conservatism. Anti-socialism's interwar hegemony, McKibbin further argues, had serious consequences for the progress of social democracy after the Second World War. Whilst this narrative is, in many respects, highly compelling, this review suggests that much recent literature on the period points to a range of alternative interpretative possibilities which offer different answers to McKibbin's core question: what kind of a democracy was Britain between the wars? Drawing on these studies, the review argues that Britain's political culture was rather more 'democratized' during these years than McKibbin allows, before finally identifying some directions for future research. © 2012 Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCarthy, H. (2012, March). Whose democracy? Histories of British political culture between the wars. Historical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X11000604

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free