Vitamin D supplementation: Less controversy, more guidance needed.

29Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone with multiple functions that extend beyond the regulation of intestinal calcium absorption. In recent years, the publication of research articles investigating associations between vitamin D status and health has reached an all-time high, and an increase in supplementation studies has followed. Given the pleiotropic effects of vitamin D, the scientific focus has gone beyond its known classic benefits on skeletal health to include diabetes and cardiovascular, neurological, respiratory, renal, and liver diseases, yet numerous conflicting findings continue to emerge. This review presents some examples of recent work within the context of controversies surrounding vitamin D and highlights key factors that should be considered when designing vitamin D supplementation regimens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stokes, C. S., & Lammert, F. (2016). Vitamin D supplementation: Less controversy, more guidance needed. F1000Research. Faculty of 1000 Ltd. https://doi.org/10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.8863.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free