Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The efficient and accurate execution of clinical trials testing novel treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a critical component of the field's collective efforts to develop effective disease-modifying treatments for AD. The lengthy and heterogeneous nature of clinical progression in AD contributes to the challenges inherent in demonstrating a clinically meaningful benefit of any potential new AD therapy. The failure of many large and expensive clinical trials to date has prompted a focus on optimizing all aspects of decision making, to not only expedite the development of new treatments, but also maximize the value of the information that each clinical trial yields, so that all future clinical trials (including those that are negative) will contribute toward advancing the field. To address this important topic the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened December 1–2, 2020. The goals focused around identifying new directions and actionable steps to enhance clinical trial decision making in planned future studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Kerchner, G. A., Dhadda, S., Garcia, M., Miller, D. S., Natanegara, F., … Weber, C. J. (2023). Decision making in clinical trials: Interim analyses, innovative design, and biomarkers. Alzheimer’s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12421

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free