Comparative evaluation of machine learning models for assessment of seabed liquefaction using finite element data

Abstract

Predicting wave-induced liquefaction around submarine pipelines is crucial for marine engineering safety. However, the complex of interactions between ocean dynamics and seabed sediments makes rapid and accurate assessments challenging with traditional numerical methods. Although machine learning approaches are increasingly applied to wave-induced liquefaction problems, the comparative accuracy of different models remains under-explored. We evaluate the predictive accuracy of four classical machine learning models: Gradient Boosting (GB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Random Forest (RF). The results indicate that the GB model exhibits high stability and accuracy in predicting wave-induced liquefaction, due to its strong ability to handle complex nonlinear geological data. Prediction accuracy varies across output parameters, with higher accuracy for seabed predictions than for pipeline surroundings. The combination of different input parameters significantly influences model predictive accuracy. Compared to traditional finite element numerical methods, employing machine learning models significantly reduces computation time, offering an effective tool for rapid disaster assessment and early warning in marine engineering. This research contributes to the safety of marine pipeline protections and provides new insights into the intersection of marine geological engineering and artificial intelligence.