Pros and cons of adopting water-wise approaches in the lower reaches of the Amu Darya: A socio-economic view

48Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The increased frequency of water shortages parallel to growing demands for agricultural commodities in the lower reaches of the Amu Darya River, Central Asia, calls for improving the system-level water use efficiency, by using interventions at the field level. Despite the existence of various best practices of effective water use (defined here as "water-wise options"), they are not widely adopted by farmers owing to high initial costs of investment and lack of the necessary knowledge and skills of a new generation of farmers after the Soviet era. For assessing the potential of several water-wise techniques, key indicators such as water use reduction rate (WURR), economic efficiency (EE), and financial viability (FV) were combined with expert surveys. A SWOT procedure was used to analyze the (dis)advantages, opportunities and constraints of adopting the selected water-wise methods. Results show that the examined options have substantial potential for increasing water use efficiency under promising EE. The various recommendations aim at improving the sustainability of irrigation water use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bekchanov, M., Lamers, J. P. A., & Martius, C. (2010). Pros and cons of adopting water-wise approaches in the lower reaches of the Amu Darya: A socio-economic view. Water (Switzerland), 2(2), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.3390/w2020200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free