Analyzing the strategy–performance relationship in Germany – can we still use the common strategic frameworks?

4Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the strategy–performance relationship within publicly traded German firms. Strategic management literature provides several strategic frameworks that offer guidance on promising strategies. However, given major changes, such as globalization, managers wonder whether strategic frameworks are still applicable. Design/methodology/approach: The authors employ principal component analysis (PCA) to measure competitive strategy and analyze a sample of 6,037 firm-years among 651 firms between 2000 and 2019. Findings: While the authors find evidence for the existence of efficiency-based strategies, differentiation-based strategies and mixed strategies, only differentiation-based strategies are positively related to performance. Originality/value: The study’s results contribute to the discourse on the strategy–performance relationship, as they provide insights into promising strategies that are of interest to researchers and practitioners. Further, the authors introduce a new measure of competitive strategy based on PCA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eulerich, M., Eulerich, A., & Fligge, B. (2023). Analyzing the strategy–performance relationship in Germany – can we still use the common strategic frameworks? Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(3), 516–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-09-2022-0157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free