Comparison of mercury distribution between liver and muscle - A biomonitoring of fish from lightly and heavily contaminated localities

108Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tissue samples from 1,117 fish of 25 species were collected from 1991 through 1996 at 13 locations along the River Elbe. The principal indicator species were perch (Perca fluviatilis) (n=118), chub (Leuciscus cephalus L.) (n=113) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) (n=138). Mercury (Hg) concentrations in muscle and liver were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. The liver/muscle index in three indicator species from heavily contaminated and lightly contaminated localities were significantly different. In fish from heavily contaminated localities, Hg was deposited preferentially in the liver (the depository for inorganic and organic forms of Hg), while in lightly contaminated areas, it was deposited preferentially in muscle. © 2008 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Havelková, M., Dušek, L., Némethová, D., Poleszczuk, G., & Svobodová, Z. (2008). Comparison of mercury distribution between liver and muscle - A biomonitoring of fish from lightly and heavily contaminated localities. Sensors, 8(7), 4095–4109. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8074095

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free