On-Site vs. laboratorial implementation of camera self-calibration for UAV photogrammetry

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigates two camera self-calibration approaches, on-site self-calibration and laboratorial self-calibration, both of which are based on self-calibration theory and implemented by using a commercial photogrammetric solution, Agisoft PhotoScan. On-site self-calibration implements camera self-calibration and aerial triangulation by using the same aerial photos. Laboratorial self-calibration implements camera selfcalibration by using photos captured onto a patterned target displayed on a digital panel, then conducts aerial triangulation by using the aerial photos. Aerial photos are captured by an unmanned aerial vehicle, and target photos are captured onto a 27in LCD monitor and a 47in LCD TV in two experiments. Calibration parameters are estimated by the two approaches and errors of aerial triangulation are analyzed. Results reveal that on-site self-calibration excels laboratorial self-calibration in terms of vertical accuracy. By contrast, laboratorial selfcalibration obtains better horizontal accuracy if photos are captured at a greater distance from the target by using a larger display panel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, S., Park, J., & Lee, W. (2016). On-Site vs. laboratorial implementation of camera self-calibration for UAV photogrammetry. Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 34(4), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2016.34.4.349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free