Evaluating Anesthetics for Improving Scientific Research and Welfare Using Larval Zebrafish

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Establishing anesthesia for ensuring both animal welfare and compatibility with protocols required for different areas of scientific research is vital. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) are one of the most used animal models in research; however, little is known about appropriate anesthetic use in this species, especially for embryo-larval life stages. Using a combination of whole-brain functional imaging, quantification of cardiovascular performance, and behavior, we explore the efficacy and tolerability of six widely used fish anesthetics (2-phenoxyethanol, benzocaine, etomidate, MS222, isoeugenol, and quinaldine sulfate) in larval zebrafish. We show that MS222 and quinaldine sulfate are the most suitable for achieving deep anesthesia, whereas etomidate is better suited for studies focused on the cardiovascular system. Only quinaldine sulfate was found to be aversive. Our findings aid researchers to select the most suitable anesthetic compounds and concentrations for their specific research goals, and the refinement of studies using anesthesia in larval zebrafish.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dimitriadou, S., Miller, M., Pilehvar, A., Sneddon, L. U., Bamsey, J. L., Hogan-Bassey, D., … Winter, M. J. (2026). Evaluating Anesthetics for Improving Scientific Research and Welfare Using Larval Zebrafish. Comprehensive Physiology, 16(3), e70174. https://doi.org/10.1002/cph4.70174

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free