What neuroscientific studies tell us about inhibition of return

15Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An inhibitory aftermath of orienting, inhibition of return (IOR), has intrigued scholars since its discovery about 40 years ago. Since then, the phenomenon has been subjected to a wide range of neuroscientific methods and the results of these are reviewed in this paper. These include direct manipulations of brain structures (which occur naturally in brain damage and disease or experimentally as in TMS and lesion studies) and measurements of brain activity (in humans using EEG and fMRI and in animals using single unit recording). A variety of less direct methods (e.g., computational modeling, developmental studies, etc.) have also been used. The findings from this wide range of methods support the critical role of subcortical and cortical oculomotor pathways in the generation and nature of IOR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Satel, J., Wilson, N. R., & Klein, R. M. (2019). What neuroscientific studies tell us about inhibition of return. Vision (Switzerland), 3(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/vision3040058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free