Sustainability science education: our animalistic response-ability

2Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, we craft a dialogue between “The Anthropocene as we know it: posthumanism, science education and scientific literacy as a path to sustainability,” by Sophia Jeong, Brandon Sherman, and Deborah Tippins and, “The quest for sustainable futures: designing transformative spaces for youth through critical response-ability,” by Shakhnoza Kayumova and Deborah Tippins. We argue for an optimistic approach to post-Anthropocene science education that acknowledges humans as the animals we are, albeit with a more sophisticated understanding of our place in the world. It is this understanding that gives us both responsibility and a response-ability to our human and non-human actors within our earthly entanglement. To do this requires reimagining science classrooms as locations of opportunity where students develop agential literacy. These classrooms provide an environment that allow students to develop their skills as sustainability engineers. We advocate for embracing indigenous ways of knowing, opening locations of possibilities through policy reform, fostering an integrated model of STEM education, and re-imagining teacher education to promote and move toward equitable science education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bateman, K. M., Steele, D., & Sexton, C. M. (2021). Sustainability science education: our animalistic response-ability. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(3), 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10039-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free