Discourse competence and abstract writing: Managing the dual identity of student and researcher

4Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Undergraduate final-year dissertations abstracts are academic texts written by students starting out as researchers. Although there are studies on abstracts produced by experts, few of them have dealt with abstracts produced by students. In this paper, abstracts written by future graduates in Applied Languages are analysed. This is done at three levels: supratextual, macro-textual (rhetorical moves) and micro-textual (metadiscourse markers). The analysis shows how rhetorical structures that are prototypical of the genre appear, as do some emergent moves. Regarding metadiscourse resources, students use a wide range of markers, the most prominent ones being metadiscourse structure markers (encapsulators —also known as shell nouns— and ordinal markers). The main finding is that the abstracts are hybrid texts: halfway between academic discourse, produced by a student to be assessed, and specialised discourse, produced by and directed to expert readers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cañada Pujols, M. D., & Martorell, C. B. (2020). Discourse competence and abstract writing: Managing the dual identity of student and researcher. RLA, 58(1), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.29393/RLA58-7MCCD20007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free