An Argument for Reversing the Bases of Science Education - A Phenomenological Alternative to Cognitionism

  • Dahlin B
  • Østergaard E
  • Hugo A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper is a phenomenological critique of some of the basic notions informing much of the researchin and practice of science education (SE) today. It is suggested that the philosophical grounds of S Eare in need of three “reversals of primacy”: the ontological primacy of the perceptual lifeworld must replace that of abstract scientific models; the epistemological primacy of attentive practice must replace that of conceptual cognition; and the pedagogical primacy of cultivating competencies must replace that of imparting ready-made knowledge. Four arguments for a phenomenological approach to SE are presented and some consequences for the training of science teachers are discussed; some of which are already being implemented at the science teacher education of the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dahlin, B., Østergaard, E., & Hugo, A. (2012). An Argument for Reversing the Bases of Science Education - A Phenomenological Alternative to Cognitionism. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 5(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.350

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free