Abstract
This paper is a phenomenological critique of some of the basic notions informing much of the researchin and practice of science education (SE) today. It is suggested that the philosophical grounds of S Eare in need of three “reversals of primacy”: the ontological primacy of the perceptual lifeworld must replace that of abstract scientific models; the epistemological primacy of attentive practice must replace that of conceptual cognition; and the pedagogical primacy of cultivating competencies must replace that of imparting ready-made knowledge. Four arguments for a phenomenological approach to SE are presented and some consequences for the training of science teachers are discussed; some of which are already being implemented at the science teacher education of the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dahlin, B., Østergaard, E., & Hugo, A. (2012). An Argument for Reversing the Bases of Science Education - A Phenomenological Alternative to Cognitionism. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 5(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.350
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.