Moral distress and moral injury in healthcare: A review and instrument analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Human and veterinary healthcare workers experience poor mental health, including burnout. However, some argue that burnout cannot fully explain their experiences. Moral distress (MD) and moral injury (MI) are gaining research attention, but there is limited consensus on their definitions and associated symptoms within healthcare. We explored how MD and MI are defined and measured in healthcare using the structure of a scoping review. Next, we conducted an item-by-item analysis to examine the instruments measuring these constructs. Our results revealed that MD focuses on antecedents, while MI emphasizes symptoms. A key gap across these instruments is the absence of a timeframe or a severity scale for distress. We also identified moral mindfulness and sensitivity to morally demanding situations as a potential third element. Finally, the potential overlap between MI and burnout’s emotional exhaustion and cynicism symptoms creates ambiguity in distinguishing whether an individual is experiencing MI, burnout, or both.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Habib, T., Noorloos, J., Woodley, H. J. R., Serrano, F., Gardiner-Davis, M., Said, C., … Gohar, B. (2026). Moral distress and moral injury in healthcare: A review and instrument analysis. Journal of Health Psychology. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251398337

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free